Performance: Ext4 performs better in everyday tasks and is faster for small file writes. 5. Thanks again! Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. Approach 2: Readjust things so the kernel and modules are on an ext4 filesystem and the data you most want to compress is on a btrfs partition. So it has no barring. Bảo vệ dữ liệu. XFS is more and more mature than Btrfs, but. One of the main reasons the XFS file system is used is for its support of large chunks of data. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. 2 and higher), but only with d_type=true enabled. Also, reducing the life of my SSD by a month is worth winning an argument from which I get absolutely no benefit. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. I do use f2fs on all of my Raspberry Pi SD cards where it gives a huge performance boost over btrfs or ext4. 356 Btrfs—short for "B-Tree File System" and frequently pronounced "butter" or "butter eff ess"—is the most advanced filesystem present in the mainline Linux kernel. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. Ext4 se basa en una tecnología más antigua, por lo que carece de las características modernas del sistema de archivos que se encuentran en sistemas como E2FS y BtrFS. EXT4 vs. Nhân bản toàn bộ Share. The ext FilesystemsBtrfs also has snapshots so you can revert back to an earlier snapshot easily, say you run arch and some update borks your system (highly unlikely), you can simply revert back to the last good snapshot. 3 XFS. It has been tried and tested, it is no doubt a solid and stable filesystem. That's right, XFS "repairs" errors on the fly, whereas ext4 requires you to remount read-only and fsck. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. 4 HDD RAID performance per his request with Btrfs, EXT4, and XFS while using consumer HDDs and an AMD Ryzen APU setup that could work out for a NAS type low-power system for anyone else that may be interested. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. It is the evolution of the most used Linux filesystems (Ext3, Ext2) and promises improved design, better performance, reliability, and features over its predecessors. both are great choices, but for me the more generally useful choice is BTRFS. Uma das decisões que você tem que tomar quando vai instalar qualquer distro Linux é o Sistema de arquivos do Linux! São vários para escolher, EXT4, XFS e BTR. On the other hand, for Linux/Unix-based devices, it might be a bit of a challenge choosing one among many options. Both cases, a mechanical drive. It's rigid and inflexible. Btrfs（技术预览） Expand section "6. Which is better largely depends on opinion. Comentado el. If you are running a more stable system like Dabian based Linux EXT4 is a better choice because it's faster file system but not as easy to revert. Running AIO-Stress on the Western Digital VelociRaptor was yielding speeds not technically possible for the Serial ATA 3. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. btrfs was slower and had reliability problems. 0 Intel Skylake 16384MB Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB LLVMpipe Realtek ALC1150 Intel Connection Ubuntu 16. OMV4 or OMV5. 4 was performing the best for RAID0 and RAID10 modes while with RAID1, XFS was performing the best. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. But… Some different plus for BTRFS Backup is about data safety. Đảm bảo dữ liệu khi backup. ago. But EXT4 is mature, rock solid, and completely reliable, and the standard for most of the linux world. XFS vs. Each one might work for you based on YOUR needs! Supp. xfs 4 threads: 97 MiB/sec. Linux có nhiều tùy chọn hệ thống file khác nhau. Ext3 and ext4 have some very specific differences, which I'll focus on here. Hello everyone, I can't choose proper filesystem between XFS, ZFS (OpenZFS), BTRFS, F2FS and EXT4. With btrfs I got 130-160MB. Here are the major feature of BTFS over ext4. Btrfs removes duplicate data from disk directly while Ext4 cannot do that, Btrfs support CoW so users can create writable and read-only. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example: The question is XFS vs EXT4. El ext4 y xf. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. BTRFS, ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 File Systems – Complete Comparison. The mount command for ext4 has the "stripe" option. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. I've read and have anecdotally (not scientific and could be affected by other things) experienced Btrfs being slower than ext4. A execução do comando quotacheck em um sistema de. Both are good file systems. Recommended for general use. 3. Storage Manager Last updated: Apr 18, 2023 Purpose This article compares the different file systems to help you decide which one to choose when creating a. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. These days the system is more refined with Dalto’s Btrfs Assistant. The 3 types of file systems support large file size and volume size. with mirrored pairs, you also have the option of. This is just an additional protection. Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. If fs performance is the only or most important thing for you, then use xfs - it's the clear winner, by far. What we mean is that we need something like resize2fs (ext4) for enlarge or shrunk on the fly, and not required to use another filesystem to store the dump for the resizing. Most distros continue to default to ext4. I understand that btrfs have a major problem with Raid, - and that is a problem. 3 which makes XFS v5 the default and all the benefits it brings. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed is comparable. my oldest one a OCZ Agility3 60GB is. The fastest for the SATA/USB tests was XFS followed quickly by EXT4 and then F2FS. Now I may send the snapshots also to an local device (formatted in Btrfs). What takes up space is each consecutive data change, that is why snapshots are created instantaneously. XFS has a few features that ext4 has not like CoW but it can't be shrinked while ext4 can. BTRFS. Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. It's solid and tested and I'm not sure I see any benefit to another file system there. In the past, I have often seen statements that EXT4 is better for gaming than XFS. e. 创建 btrfs 文件系统 6. 8 snapshot as of last week. ZoL Performance, Ubuntu ZFS On Linux Reference Storage : 2019-04-24: Linux 5. 0. All my systems (4) have been using BTRFS for some time now without any issues. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. One of the biggest differences between them is that their supported operating system. , a really large number of processes all writing to the filesystem at once). EXT4は、Linuxベースのオペレーティングシステムのメインファイルシステムです。Complexity: btrfs is a more complex file system than ext4, and may require more advanced knowledge and expertise to manage and maintain. We will determine which one is the best ZFS, BTRFS, and EXT4. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS file systems File systems like ZFS, EXT4, and BTRFS may seem strange or. On multi-drive systems, the opposite might be true, zfs outperforming ext4. But they come with the smallest set of features compared to newer filesystems. But, as always, your specific use case affects this greatly, and there are corner cases where any of. XFS Storage : 2019-01-07: FreeBSD ZFS vs. Although Btrfs lacks stability and maturity as of this writing, it is more feature-rich than EXT4 despite this. The only time there were issues was when my RAM sticks went bad and btrfs detected it and put my FS into read-only mode to prevent corruption. Also BRTFS compresses the file system using less space compared to EXT4 but again the tradeoff is it uses more computer. , power failure) could be acceptable. Phoronix: Linux 4. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. Precisely, it seems to be 50%. If you do hardware RAID, with a dedicated RAID card, just do not use ZFS please, it will break your data at some point. AdamV158. 하지만 리소스 문제나 호환성 등을 생각한다면 EXT4도 포기할 수 없죠. The SATA 3. Linux File-systems were tested on NVMe SSD including EXT3, BTRFS, EXT4, XFS, and ZFS from the mainline kernel of Linux 4. ext4 or XFS are otherwise good options if you back up your config. I think in many ways btrfs is the better filesystem, but I seem to have noticed that it takes longer to copy data than on ext4. First up was the SQLite embedded SQL database library test. By far, XFS can handle large data better than any other filesystem on this list and do it reliably too. Let's go over File Systems in this video. Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. As well as ext4. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. 1. However, if you are looking for a. Let's go over File Systems in this video. Btrfs lacks maturity and stability at the time of this writing but is more feature-rich compared to EXT4. 불가능. " And it can be much faster than btrfs, especially with lots of smaller files. XFS A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. #filesystem #ext4 #xfs #linuxExplicación de las diferencias entre sistemas de archivos, en este vídeo se comparan los 2 mas usados en GNU/Linux. And generally, files that arent compressible, wont be forcefully compressed. But I would still refrain from using it on the deck due to the case folding trouble. Btrfs vs. Ext4 is a journaled filesystem, which simply means that it “journals” the location of the files on the disk and keeps track of the changes on the disk. 2. Ext4 is the fourth version of the Ext (Extended) File System for Linux and is probably the most well-known file system for Linux out there. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. How do the major file systems supported by Linux differ from each other? Compared to Ext4, XFS has a relatively poor performance for single threaded, metadata-intensive workloads. And the I discovered how many tools are out there to recover data from EXT partitions and how few for XFS. But. Here is a look at the Linux 5. ran defragment utility to compress all existing files. Support for large file sizes - The Ext4 supports a single file size of up to 16 TiB ( Tebibytes ) whereas XFS supports a max file size of up to 8 exbibytes. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe solid-state drive. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. Utilice. Linux vs. As cotas XFS não são uma opção remountable. F2FS vs. To mount the XFS file system so that it uses the external journal, specify the -o logdev=device option to the. On the other hand BTRFS, while mainlined, has many important issues and performance problem (the common suggestion for databases or VMs is to disable CoW which, in turn, disabled checksumming - which is, frankly, not an acceptable answer). EarthyFeet. When running PostMark, ZFS came out far ahead of the UFS file-systems being more than ten times faster than. Allerdings hatte BTRFS eine deutlich bessere Leistung bei kleinen. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. 3. NTFS Benchmarks Continuing on from yesterday's Linux 4. Under Compile Bench, EXT4 was the fastest on all three drives followed by a mix of XFS and F2FS. Neither of the filesystems is better supported by OMV4 or OMV5. EXT4 is just a file system, as NTFS is - it doesn't really do anything for a NAS and would require either hardware or software to add some flavor. Yves Trudeau. Ext4 and XFS are the fastest, as expected. 3. 500GB HDD formatted as NTFS for luks containers. Features of the XFS and ZFS. Ext4 is probably the final evolution of the ext filesystem (which started with ext, then ext2, ext3, and now ext4). Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. Even if you do notice. It’s an improved version of the older Ext3 file system that includes a lot of great features, including ones for Solid State Drives (SSDS). 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. They both use delayed allocation to achieve file fragmentation while both do not support mounted snapshots. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. Resizing (growing) is possible with btrfs and xfs. They perform differently for some specific workloads like creating or deleting tenthousands of files / folders. 0, XFS is the default file system instead of ext4. The XFS file system is loved in the Linux community for its ability to handle and manage significant. A tool for managing BTRFS and LVM snapshots. While RAID 5 and 6 can be compared to RAID Z. ext4 can claim historical stability, while the consumer advantage of btrfs is snapshots (the ease of subvolumes is nice too, rather than having to partition). XFS is spectacularly fast during both the insertion phase and the workload execution. Although XFS is good, in practice I've found ext4 to be slightly faster. F2FS vs. my rough draft would be to offer an advanced option for the mount points (i. what i found is that ext3 lost around 5-10 files out of every million, XFS around 5-30 per million and both Reiser and JFS went to several hundreds, a thousand lost files in at least one case. ago. A continuación, os vamos a explicar brevemente las principales características de EXT4 y de Btrfs. You didn't provide the Linux distribution information, but assuming CentOS or Red Hat, XFS is now somewhat integrated. All of these Linux. So if you have a SSD and care about the wear of that then. Linux provides the statx(2) system call interface for retrieving the file birth time for filesystems that support it since kernel version 4. Файловая система Ext4 это улучшенная версия Ext3, которая, в свою очередь, не что иное, как переработанная Ext2. Ceph's recommendation for the choice of filesystem is between btrfs and XFS. 0 X. Btrfs provides checksums for data and metadata, ensuring enhanced data integrity. I know how to maintain it even in case of horrible events. Depends on what you're looking for. Both btrfs and zfs feel like the worst options considering their overhead. webbphillips • 8 mo. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. The use of checksums in Btrfs can prevent silent data corruption. Higher scores are better. I’ll take XFS and/or EXT4 any day over rolling another btrfs filesystem that isn’t stable, but has a bunch of gimmicky features any day of the week. The preferable option depends on your specific needs and priorities. Here are some key differences between them: XFS is a high-performance file system that Silicon Graphics originally developed. For the data drive, personally, I have stuck. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. Since btrfs does not work like a normal partition, but uses volumes and subvolumes per default on fedora, you may see other challenges. BtrFS looked promising, but last I checked it still couldn't be trusted in RAID modes. Your gaming performance shouldn't be affected by either, since games are mostly just reads anyways. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. If you think that you need. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. Recommend. Better for gaming, my money is on ZFS if you have extra RAM to spare and restrict the cache size. Abstract and Figures. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. 15 Git kernels. FYI: btrfs. In a few words, I just need a really reliable and fast filesystem for years ahead, with the care of SSD in mind, I need it mostly for gaming, video-audio production, working with a lot of small/medium files (from 100-500Kb to 100-150Gb) sending them. EXT4 vs. It was also during a power outage, and yes I should have had that. Crypto2. Btrfs vs ext4 . Features of the XFS and ZFS. In my second round I made setups with btrfs on the nvme SSD and luks+btrfs on 2TB HDD as RAID1. Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. We recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. Picking a filesystem is not really relevant on a Desktop computer. Ext4 comes up with some new and improved features such as: Extent-based. Either way you go, just leave EXT4 where it is, in the ground. As for why btrfs on root, well, it offers rollback on updates and. With not having the time to conduct the usual kernel version vs. Recommended for general use. Ext4 - очень стабильная файловая система, которая была выбрана по. For anything with higher capability, XFS tends to be faster. LVM takes a set of block devices and presents the system with a new (LV) block device with a fixed mapping to physical blocks. . Tl;dr: The best filesystem for Unraid. The benchmark results of three most common file systems under Linux environment were given in this paper. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. EXT3 이후 나온 EXT4는 기존 버전보다 안정성은 향상이 되었지만 범용성과. Checksum: if your file (or some metadata) gets corrupted, the checksum will detect and in some case. ) and if/how to preallocate metadata etc. I was using NTFS due to compatibility. The 12,3 % reduction in compilation time with BtrFS is a nice improvement but pales compared to the 58,4 % reduction seen with Ext4 on the same hardware doing the same task. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. Its primary developer, Kent Overstreet, first announced it in 2015, and it will be added to the Linux kernel beginning with 6. This is the number of data disks times the number of blocks per. the mirrored pairs would be much faster for both reads and writes. Both filesystems provide COW but XFS fragments less (and it's data cow only so no snapshots, only reflinks). XFS. Hi I never worry about it… my latest SSD SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB has a 10 (limited) year 50GB a day warranty, Have OCZ’s with thousands of hours running btrfs all running fine. XFS and ext4 now calculate a checksum on metadata and their journal files. The BTRFS RAID is not difficult at all to create or problematic, but up until now, OMV does not support BTRFS RAID creation or management through the webGUI, so you have to use the terminal. It also wasn't formatted with -m finobt=1 which is a game-changer for XFS performance with small files and heavy metadata updates. Usable space isn't a big issue but I don't want to lose half with RAID 10. 10. Phoronix: Linux 4. are two different decisions you have to make. Language: Format: Language and Page Formatting Options. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. 0 and particularly with F2FS seeing fixes as a result of it being picked up by Google for support on Pixel devices, I was curious to see. There’s very little difference between EXT4 and XFS, both in total throughput and behavior over time. However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. 0 hard drive when using EXT4 and XFS. Using Btrfs, just expanding a zip file and trying to immediately enter that new. ago. ZFS brings robustness and stability, while it avoids the corruption of large files. Data integrity protection. It is suitable for PC platforms and network. My home file share runs zol because I prefer zfs to btrfs and run it at work a lot so I'm much more comfortable with it. Ext4 is the default filesystem in Manjaro at the moment. . , power failure) could be acceptable. You get awesome functionality like cp --reflink and btrfs subvolume snapshot -r and btrfs send and btrfs receive . 0 File-System. zfs not. Bcachefs is the file-system born out of the Linux kernel's block cache code and has been worked on the past several years by. as @Neoon pointed out ext4 (on your mdraid) works just fine, for that you can rather discuss the usage of raw vs qemu, which driver (virtio, scsi,. 7. However, BTRFS had significantly better performance with small files than EXT4. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. "Open-source" is the primary reason people pick Btrfs over the competition. Per the recommendation from RedHat: Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. Hi, I think BTRFS is actually faster then ZFS on Linux. Built By the Slant team. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. But not enough users follow the guide on and instead do stuff that actually makes the system worse. Another point against btrfs is the insane amount of memory it uses. Indie games often too get fair amount of gain. btrfs sub cr /mnt/@ (the @ alone is the convention for "root directory" in btrfs) btrfs sub cr /mnt/@home. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example:The question is XFS vs EXT4. Januar 2020. Linux 5. Across the three tested RAID modes, EXT4 was performing the worst. Ext4 file system is an ideal choice. Is XFS better than btrfs? September 30, 2023 by Garry. 38. Ext4 vs ext3. Linux 5. Ext4, Btrfs, and XFS are three widely used file systems in Linux. In Summary, ZFS, by contrast with EXT4, offers nearly unlimited capacity for data and metadata storage. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. Ext4 has journaling on by default, and new users likely won’t know how to disable it to save read/writes on their SSDs. For these reasons, Fedora has made BTRFS the standard filesystem in their newer releases. XFS vs EXT4!This is a very common question when it comes to Linux filesystems and if you’re looking for the difference between XFS and EXT4, here is a quick summary:. It can hold up to 1 billion terabytes of data. Same could be said of reads, but if you have a TON of memory in the server that's greatly mitigated and work well. kernel. It is a copy-on-write (CoW) filesystem supporting. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. ZFS likes eating RAM. The benchmark I linked attributes this to copy-on-write behaviour of btrfs. 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. At least on 13. ago. Btrfs es mucho más rápido de lo que crees basándote en esos benchmarks, ya que no se ajustan a tu caso de uso. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. Downside is that it's a slower file system due to it's nature of redundancy. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. Be sure to change the /etc/fstab to reflect the change ( type to btrfs and fs_passno [the last field] to 0 as Btrfs does not do a file system check on boot). BTRFS is newer, and the performance is not as good in many cases, but it is not far off. It's an improved version of the older Ext3 file system. #6. It was later developed for Linux. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits. XFS supports larger file sizes and. I'd say ext, because it is faster, and because you asking means, that you don't know how to use btrfs features, otherwise the choice is obvious: need snapshots -> btrfs, need reflinks -> XFS, default -> ext4. 我们主要讨论Linux中主流的三个文件系统：Ext4、XFS以及Btrfs的功能特点 ext4 文件系统由 ext3 文件系统改进而来，而后者又是从 ext2 文件系统改进而来。 虽然 ext4 文件系统已经非常稳定，是过去几年中绝大部分发行版的默认选择，但它是基于陈旧的代码开发而来。Linux 4. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need to be explicitly enabled in. Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. And you might just as well use EXT4. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. 2. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. Ext2 → Ext3 → Ext4. SSD Disk Observations. But. Zu diesen gehören eine integrierte RAID-Funktionalität, ein inkludierter Volume Manager und die Unterstützung von Dateisystemen bis 16EiB. Use xfs_info to verify that the ftype option is set to 1. It's stable and time-proven. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. For the Proxmox host, if you install it and use LVM-thin as root pool option in the Proxmox installer, it will automatically make a root partition in EXT4. ZFS on FreeBSD may be faster than BTRFS on Linux. for data security and integrity zfs is the best. now i would do ext4 and btrfs instead of ReiserFS and JFS. I suggest to give the arch wiki a read to get an overview what btrfs provides and where it’s limited in comparison to other solutions. Hello everyone, The time has come again for me to reinstall arch once more. Rep: XFS has unbalanced performance, but in the best use case blows away many other formats. It does its job well.